I chose to
research the Buddhism view on abortion because I thought it might be a
complicated issue considering the cycle of samsara. My researched showed that there is no
universal view of abortion in Buddhism.
Traditional Buddhists seem to reject abortion and view it as the
destruction of a life, however, modern Buddhists seem to feel all over the map
about it.
One of the
central, if not the central, idea of Buddhism is understanding the effects of
your actions and having responsibility for those consequences. An abortion is an action that causes a very
real consequence. All over the world,
whether an abortion is murder is stills something people are fighting over.
According to the
BBC,
“According to the
teachings of Buddha, five conditions must be present to constitute an act of
killing.
·
The thing killed must be a living being
·
You, the killer, must know or be aware that it
is a living being
·
You must have the intention to kill it
·
There must be an effort to kill
·
The Being must be killed as a result”
-BBC
This
metric makes it seem like abortion is killing, except the first two bullet
points make it still up for debate. Is a
blastocyst or a fetus “a living being”?
And, if the person destroying the fetus doesn’t believe it is “a living
being”, then is it not an act of
killing?
There is also the
very real issue that comedian Bo Burnham called, “the probable problem of a
pro-life abortion” in his song “New Math”.
Abortions are performed in order to save a woman’s life every day. The BBC article says that in these cases, it
is the intentions with which the act is done that matter. “If the decision is taken compassionately,
... the moral harm done will be reduced with the good intentions involved” (BBC).
Interestingly, the
Dalai Lama has spoken about abortions performed when it is discovered that the
fetus will have severe developmental disabilities.
“If the unborn child
will be retarded or if the birth will create serious problems for the parent,
these are cases where there can be an exception. I think abortion should be approved or
disapproved according to each circumstance.”
- Dalai Lama, New York
Times, November 28, 1993
I think this statement is really
interesting. He starts out by basically
saying he thinks that it is fine to abort mentally handicapped children –
something that many would have moral problems with regardless of religion. But he then backs off a bit saying it should
be a case-by-case decision. This is a
very diplomatic answer – he basically leave the issue open for interpretation.
The
BBC article brought up an issue I didn’t even think of - abortion is viewed as bad karma for the
woman and abortionist, obviously, but apparently it is also viewed as bad karma
for the fetus as well. This is because
an abortion means the ‘soul’ is immediately sent back to the cycle of death and
life without the chance to accumulate good karma.
Something
that came up in multiple articles I read was Japan’s relationship with Buddhism
and abortion. Abortion is extremely common
there, and so a tradition has developed of making offerings to Jizo, god of
lost travellers and children, during a memorial service for the aborted fetus
that incorporates Buddhist as well as Shinto and local traditions. This practice is rejected by most Buddhist
organizations because the practice has no basis in Buddhist texts. It is also problematic because some temples
will exploit women who have had an abortion by charging them money for these
services and instilling fear that if they don’t use the services they could be
victims of retribution from the fetus’ soul.
I am glad I did this research because it turned out to be a more complicated issue than I initially thought.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/religion/religions/buddhism/buddhistethics/abortion.shtml
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteI think there is a lot of value in the Dalai Lama leaving things open for interpretation. Because each case is unique and should be left to the decision of those directly involved. The intent of any individual should be one of the most important factors used when judging their actions.
ReplyDeleteVery interesting post and I agree with Stacy that there is value in what the Dalai Lama said.
ReplyDelete